Sunday, July 18, 2010

Reflections

India – An adventure into international business, travel, and myself

I would suggest that any MBA student at any college needs to experience an international business study tour similar to the experience we had in India. I learned a lot about myself, and my own biases, doing business in a foreign place, as well as practical customs and cultural differences in India. I was removed from my comfort zone, and transported both literally and figuratively to a whole new land. A place as diverse as the whole of Europe, with so many different languages, foods, and religions.

The most striking thing to me about India was the overwhelming undercurrent of entrepreneurialism. Everyone, from millionaire real estate developers to street vendors to kids on the street trying to sell travel maps showed me that spirit. Everyone realizes that it is up to them to make their own way, and that no one is going to hand them anything. As such, the hard work at every level is very evident. People are busting their tails to better their own lives and that of their families. This work ethic, and this spirit, is the thing that I will remember the most about India. While I had an amazing experience seeing all of the sites (especially the Taj Mahal), and experiencing new foods, and new experiences; when I talk about this trip years in the future with people who want to know what the real business is like in India, I will tell them about the work ethic, and the entrepreneurial spirit that I experienced.

I was also privy to other more unsavory experiences. We saw a recently hit pedestrian dying on the side of the road because the road systems are certifiably insane. The traffic is unreal, and the infrastructure needs some serious work. We witnessed poverty unlike anything we have ever seen, and perhaps ever will see again. However, in the faces of such poverty, I saw hope. I also found prejudice within myself which I was not expecting. I found myself ignoring the kids on the street, because I assumed they were just going to try to pickpocket me, or rip me off. That indeed may have been the case, but my attitude and prejudice went beyond simply being careful. I was really able to identify within myself something that needed to change. By the end of the trip, I felt that I was able to identify my preconceived notion and effect a meaningful change on my own outlook.

As much learning as I did about myself, I learned just as much or more about doing business in India. I learned about the growing power of the workforce, the increasing creativity being fostered within schools, as well as the dynamic business spirit. Given that I am about to work at Cisco, being able to tour the campus in Bangalore was an amazing opportunity. I feel that having this experience, and being able to draw on the collective experience of so many people with so much international business experience is something that will set me apart from many other MBA candidates at other schools. This experience has changed me, and has taught me invaluable information.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Book Review - How to Win Friends and Influence People

How to Win Friends and Influence People

Author: Dale Carnegie

ISBN: 978-1-4391-6734-2

By: Simon & Schuster

Copyright 1936 Dale Carnegie

Overview:

How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie is half anecdotal comedy and half self-help book. The layout is simple and easy to follow. The author outlines a method of dealing with a person or a situation. He then proceeds to explain the reasoning behind the idea. Next he gives 5-6 testimonials from his students who have told him stories where they have utilized the concept that he is teaching. The style is very easy to read and to follow.

This book was written at a time when the prevailing philosophy in business was fire and brimstone from the top down. The author wanted to find a comprehensive book or course on effective ways of communicating with people, getting them to like you, and ultimately doing business with you. He discovered that none such book or course existed, and he set out to find a set of rules to follow to do so. He interviewed a large number of successful business people, and took an in depth look at his own life and personality. He discovered many truths, each of which is the basis for a chapter of the book:

Techniques for handling People:

1. Don’t criticize, condemn or complain.

2. Give honest and sincere appreciation.

3. Arouse in the other person an eager want.

Ways to make people like you:

1. Become genuinely interested in other people.

2. Smile.

3. Remember that a person’s name is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language.

4. Be a good listener. Encourage others to talk about themselves.

5. Talk in terms of the other person’s interests.

6. Make the other person feel important—and do it sincerely.

Ways to win people to your way of thinking:

1. The only way to get the best of an argument is to avoid it.

2. Show respect for the other person’s opinions. Never say, “You’re wrong.”

3. If you are wrong, admit it quickly and emphatically.

4. Begin in a friendly way.

5. Get the other person saying “yes, yes” immediately.

6. Let the other person feel that the idea is his or hers.

7. Try honestly to see things from the other person’s point of view.

8. Be sympathetic with the other person’s ideas and desires.

9. Appeal to the nobler motives.

10. Dramatize your ideas.

11. Throw down a challenge.

Be a leader – A leader’s job often includes changing your people’s attitudes and behavior.

1. Begin with praise and honest appreciation.

2. Call attention to people’s mistakes indirectly.

3. Talk about your own mistakes before criticizing the other person.

4. Ask questions instead of giving direct orders.

5. Let the other person save face.

6. Praise the slightest improvement and praise every improvement. Be “hearty in your approbation and lavish in your praise.”

7. Give the other person a fine reputation to live up to.

8. Use encouragement. Make the fault seem easy to correct.

9. Make the other person happy about doing the thing you suggest.

Many of these ideas seem like common sense to us now. However, when you honestly read this book, and evaluate your own life and personality, the ideas, while simple, can be very eye opening. This new type of dealing with people is very effective and really boils down to the old golden rule. Treat others how you would like to be treated. If you give to other people everything that you would want, people will become friendly with you. Let them talk about themselves and their problems, and even if they don’t realize it, they will find you interesting.

The Relevance

This book is very relevant to the business world today. Even though many more people are much more aware of the right and wrong way to deal with people, it is often a failed proposition for many people. Even if they understand the right way to deal with people, they fail to implement it. In a job market which is saturated with talent, one of the keys to standing out in interviews as well as on the job is through interpersonal skills. If you can get an interviewer to like you straight off you stand to gain a much better chance of securing the job, the raise, or the promotion. Having these skills can help you to secure a significant other, keep one, or have a happier relationship. It does not seem surprising that the secret to winning friends and influencing people is appealing to people’s egos by making them feel important, appreciated, and significant.

Where Carnegie Falls Short:

The biggest problem with Carnegie’s work is the age. While this may have been a pioneering work of his time, many of the illustrations and slang that he uses are dated. The message behind what he is saying is still very relevant, however, it is abundantly clear that this was written in the thirties. In fact many of the things that he observes are now business norms. Perhaps that is a testament to the longevity and importance of his work, but to someone currently involved in business, some of the ideas are now accepted as common practice. Otherwise, the book achieves its goal, and despite these shortcomings, there are some very illuminating ideas, and important concepts which he drives home with ease.

Where Carnegie Excels:

What surprised me the most about the novel is that after my first few reading sessions, I already found myself implementing many of the ideas that I had just read about. It was tough at the beginning, because my gut reaction to many situations was to fly off the handle and become very angry with the person who had just wronged me. However Carnegie helped me realize that while that would make me feel better, it would make the other person feel bad. Generally in situations like that you still need something from the person who you are angry with, and becoming angry or threatening will not bring them any closer to helping you than it did previously. I have learned a lot not just from the Principals (listed above), but also the anecdotes (however antiquated) that go with them.

My Recommendations and Closing Thoughts:

This book is incredibly important to read for any modern American. I think if more people attempted to live by the principals that it espouses, we would have a much more genial society. People who are looking for success would do well to heed the advice that this book offers. I would recommend this book as a blueprint for anyone who is teaching or studying leadership.

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Story of India Assignment

Story of India
Indus Valley
1. Harappa contained items such as large bathing areas, and wells which were very advanced for their time. They also contained individual living quarters with houses and gathering buildings.
2. In terms of agriculture, monsoons can cause problems because they are so erratic. If they are expected to come on a certain day, but they are delayed, it can cause a draught, and have a large economic impact. In trade, the roads are very hard to maintain due to the heavy rainfall brought on by the monsoons.

The Ganges River
1. According to scriptures, the Ganges is not only mentioned multiple times, but the river itself is thought to be a Goddess and a tradition. The river is used as a cremation ground for many religious Hindus.
2. Karma is considered to be a spiritual law which is produced by words, thoughts, and actions. I think that the same way that Christian’s view people using the Lord’s name in vain is disrespectful; I would imagine that Hindu’s feel the same way about something like Karma.

Tamil Nadu
1. The British wanted Tamil Nadu for its important role in trade. The East India trading company found the area to be of particular value.
2. Tamil Nadu traded spices, cloth, and plants to Rome for coins, wine, and other items. They did not import nearly as much as they exported.

Edicts of Ashoka
4. The law of cause and effect is the most important teaching of Buddha to today’s world. Everything that we do has a reaction, and if more people considered this it would be wise.

Agriculture
3. Modern agriculture only survives today as such a large employer due to heavy government subsidies. That is the reason that the GDP output is so low. As we have read, India is quickly becoming the “back office” center of the world. Their economy is shifting from being agrarian in nature to being more technologically based. Agriculture is still a large need in the country, especially due to the number of people that need to be fed. I think that it might diminish some in economic output, but the production output will need to remain high.

Peshawar
2. Babur was a direct descendant of Timur, and of Genghis Khan, two influential leaders throughout history.
3. Throughout history, the Khyber Pass has been an important trade route, as well as being a strategic military position. The pass connects Pakistan and Afghanistan. Throughout history many conquerors have used the pass to wage war against India. Some of the most prominent include: Cyrus the Great, Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, Babur the Tiger, and many others. All were seeking conquest of India.

Allahabad
1. Allahabad means “City of God” and the fact that it still carries that name today indicates a level of spirituality. In 2001 marking the festival which happens every 144 years, Allahabad held a gathering of 60 million people, which made it the largest gathering in the world. This level of dedication is a clear indicator that the historical spirituality is alive and well no matter how modernized the society becomes.
4. After the Great Rebellion of 1857, the British had an excuse to dissolve the East India Trading Company, and take formal control of the subcontinent for itself. The queen named herself the Empress of India. The British government was now in charge of running India.

Religion
1. The secular constitution is important to the stability of India because of the incredibly diverse nature of the Indian democracy. While the majority tends to rule the country, if the constitution had been written strictly by the majority, there would be many other religions in the region which would be discriminated against (even more than they currently are), and many possibly banished from the country. The stability of the country would most certainly be threatened with a religion-based government. There is already so much religious violence, that any state-controlled version would cause major problems, as well as renouncement from the world-wide community.

Fatehpur Sikri
3. I do not think that a universal religion could work in modern day times. The intention is to unify people, but it usually has the opposite effect. People have so much history and culture and tradition tied to their religion that having to sacrifice any of it as part of a unified religion would never be accepted.

Science and Medicine
1. Yoga has become popular outside of India because it fits in to many people’s taste for something that is pure and natural. We have such a synthetic and manufactured world, that a chance for relax and exercise and meditation is very enticing to many people. It is a chance to slow down the fast paced life.

Performing Arts
1. Dance plays an important role in Indian Culture. It has roots in Religion, especially in religious ceremonies, and other events. It is also used with narrative forms, and as a part of mythology.

Taj Mahal
1. The Taj Mahal is a mausoleum which was built in memory of Mumtaz Mahal, the recently deceased wife of the ruler, Shah Jahan.
2. The giant dome in the center, as well as the tall minarets are the most impressive architectural elements of the Taj Mahal in my view.

Partition and Independence
1. After a long period of British rule, many in India surely felt that it would be a perfect chance to assert their religious culture within the government now that it was not being suppressed by the government. The Indian National Congress foresaw the problems which I talked about earlier as to why it would be a bad idea to allow this influence.
3. The Indian’s used WW2 as a chance for subversion against the British. The British first enlisted the help of the Indian’s in exchange for their independence, but that deal was never struck. The Indian’s then went to Japan for help. Although they picked the wrong side to support, they ultimately won their independence.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Statehood Movements in India

Overview:

India is comprised of 28 states. Since India gained independence from Britain in 1947 the country’s young democracy has endured many external and internal challenges. The economy was stagnant and closed off from the outside world until 1991 when India enacted a series of economic reforms which opened up their economy to the outside world, and allowed India to begin to become the back office powerhouse that we know of today. Besides poverty, religious, cultural, and language clashes, one of the biggest issues that has faced the young country is the issue of the creation of states. Much as America struggled to conquer territory and establish states, there is infighting in India with different cultural separations manifesting through geographic and political line drawing disputes. There are two major statehood movements that will be addressed in the subsequent sections. Most notable is the statehood movement of Telangana which has been in the news as recently as December, but dates back to the days of independence from Britain. Another important statehood movement to look at historically was the Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, and Jharkhand movement of the year 2000.

Telangana Movement:

The Telangana Movement is very interesting for a number of different reasons. First is the history of the region. Dating back to before British independence the Telangana region of the state of Andhra Pradesh has been a source of conflict. During British rule, Telangana (though not the whole state of AP) was an independent province. Indeed even up to 1956, Telangana existed as a separate state. It wasn’t until November of that year that it was absorbed by the state of Andhra to create AP. Needless to say even at that time the citizens were not in favor of the merger. The people of Telangana did not have a majority, and therefore faced persecution by their new majority leaders. They were made promises that the power would not be exploited, but many claim that they have been.

The main economic dispute in this statehood movement comes over the city of Hyderabad, an epicenter of technological innovation with Indian headquarters for many foreign companies located there. Multinational corporations like Microsoft, Google, Motorola, and Dell call this city home. Obviously having these powerhouses in the region should have spurred major economic growth. Unfortunately for the people living in the Telangana region, they have yet to feel the trickledown effect of that economic prosperity. The citizens (in what is an extremely poor region) feel that the large size of the AP state means that the economic success gets distributed amongst a vastly larger number of people. Understandably, the state is in no mood to let Telangana (and the thriving economy of Hyderabad) go without a fight. However the people of Telangana were ready for a change, even if they weren’t so sure it was possible. An unlikely political leader emerged, often slighted by his own political party, K. Chandrasekhar Rao decided that the time for change was now. He led the movement by initiating a hunger strike. It lasted approximately ten days before the government currently in power relented and agreed to start the process of allowing Telangana to become its own independent state. The move has sent shockwaves throughout the country, given the messy nature of the hunger strike which was handled by the government with a heavy hand (Rao was arrested, before being hospitalized). It made national news. More importantly, many people fear the repercussions in other contested statehood movement areas throughout India such as Gurkha in West Bengal. Those favoring a strong, unified national government often change their tune as the government changes hands. What is most important politically to most politicians is the powerful party in a given region. Much as gerrymandering occurs in the United States, with political parties redistricting areas so that they have strong beds of power (allowing them to win more seats in the House of Representatives), many people in the large Indian states feel that if they relinquish power by allowing a state to cede, they will have less national power. The major political parties want to maintain control over areas as large as possible, and breaking up states into smaller regions, especially those which they are in solid command of, makes no political sense. Thus the dispute endures across regions, for both historical and economic, but mostly political purposes. Ultimately, it comes down to power. Don’t cede power if you have it. Those who are not in power will call upon cultural and historical ties to make the case for their own right to statehood. We see this trend all over the world. Whether it be the creation of Pakistan, when it was decided that there needed to be a major separation of Hindi and Muslim countries, or the dispute between Israel and Palestine, the hunger for independence is strong amongst the people who feel oppressed. In the Telangana region, the city of Hyderabad is largely Muslim, and no doubt fuels the state’s disputes. The addition of the 29th state of Telangana has the potential to start a trend amongst India’s millions of poor who feel oppressed. The interesting thing to see in the coming months and years will be to observe the future of Hyderabad and whether or not the new state of Telangana is formed as promised. Given the large size of India as a country, more decentralized government has a chance to make more real gains for people as long as there is a unified message going out to foreigners, especially foreign investors. If they begin to see India as a regionalized entity with no strict control, it will make it very hard to forecast business and costs into the future. The push toward many states will be a positive force for India, especially preserving the culture, and separating religions, so long as the national government maintains strong control, and does the right thing when given the opportunity.

Recent Statehood movements – Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, and Jharkhand:

The three states are relatively new, all of which were established in the year 2000. The fascinating thing about these states is that they realize a fact that many parts of India have still failed to embrace. Incentives for businesses to invest in the infrastructure of the region, as well as to build on the land will quickly and efficiently bring the states up to speed with the rest of the nation, and given the relative autonomous nature of statehood, will allow them to surpass many other states if they continue with the pro-business incentives that they currently have in place. The government’s responsibility is simple. Provide basic infrastructure, such as roads and power, and then provide great incentives to business to come to the state, and finally, get out of the way. Doing these things will help catapult the fledgling states to the forefront of business in India. The three states have already garnered large investments from firms such as Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, Sterlite Optical and Hero Honda in Uttarakhand; Tata Steel, Essar Steel, and MoUs in Chhattisgarh, and Arcelor Mittal, Tata Steel, Essar Steel, Jindal Steel & Power, and RPG Power in Jharkhand. All three states have provided strong economic incentives for companies to invest in both infrastructure and land in their area. Most importantly, because they are relatively new, they can set standards which might not be acceptable to stalwart states in other regions of India. Fresh free market, high incentive, low tax economic policies will quickly develop these new states. These three states can be a great example to Telangana, assuming that it actually does achieve the promised statehood.

Conclusion:

Statehood movements present an interesting problem for modern day India. Where India as a nation was fighting for independence as recently as the 1940s, now cultural and religious groups are recognizing the benefits of doing the same for themselves. India’s bloated, gigantic states can lead to inefficiencies in both the economic situation as well as the political operation. Some decentralization seems inevitable as India strives to compete in the world’s economy.

Sources:

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2009/1211/New-India-state-Telangana-may-fuel-other-statehood-movements

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/11/world/asia/11india.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

http://beacononline.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/big-fight-for-small-states/

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1097

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Book Review: The Elephant and the Dragon

The Elephant and the Dragon: The Rise of India and China and What it Means for All of Us

Author: Robyn Meredith

ISBN: 978-0-393-33193-6

By: W.W Norton & Company Inc.

Copyright 2008, 2007 by Robyn Meredith

Overview:

The Elephant and the Dragon is a sobering and historical look at the rise of India since 1991, and the rise of China since their own economic reforms in 1978. Meredith explores the intricate political, cultural, and economic reforms that have gone on in both countries over the last 30 years. Frequently she tries to illustrate what life was like for people at every level of society. The Elephant and the Dragon intermingles facts about salaries, GDP, and living conditions alongside heartbreaking and heartwarming stories of both economic success stories, as well as those who still struggle to find economic salvation since the adoption of western economic philosophies.

The book is laid out in an interesting way, as it goes chapter by chapter alternating between China and India as it peels back another layer of the story for each country as it progresses. At the same time, it compares and contrasts the two powers even as it moves forward to unveil more of the story.

China is revealed to be the manufacturing powerhouse that all of us have come to expect in the age where “Made in America” has become “Made in China.” Notably, China’s rise to power has been facilitated by a number of factors. The rise can be attributed to four major factors. First is that China was an economic copycat of Singapore. Following on that model, the system of economic development started from the ground up (literally). They worked to first develop their infrastructure, and that in turn has allowed manufacturing progress to occur over time. Businesses have roads to rural areas that they can rely on. While electricity and other resources are scarce, they are far more advanced in many areas than those in India, and other developing countries. The third thing which spurred China’s economic growth is the discovery of the supply chain model (affectionately titled the “disassembly line by Meredith). This model, developed in part by Li and Fung allows for a distributive model, very unlike the Henry Ford assembly lines of old. The supply chain model allows for individual pieces of a finished good to be produced on different lines within the same factory, or different factories in the region, or even different factories around the world. They are then brought together under one roof for a last time and assembled. This flexibility has allowed factories to specialize in making one item. Meredith mentioned a factory which makes thousands of varieties of doll eyes. Meredith follows the production of a sweater from an upscale clothing designer in America, and shows the flow of the raw materials and the production process from start to finish. The fourth thing that has assisted China’s economy in its rapid expansion is the authoritarian nature of their government. Whereas Indian’s government has struggled to implement many reforms because they are beholden to the voters at every step of the way; for better or worse, China’s government has sole authority to dictate the path of development. While this system is unbelievably corrupt, it can also be very efficient. The government uses many of its resources to build infrastructure, spending far less on social programs for its people than other countries. Additionally, they would not think twice about displacing any of their citizens for the sake of progress. This has allowed their infrastructure to grow at an unchecked pace, and has made the area very enticing for outside companies due to cheap wages, and efficient transport means. Even if outsiders have to “grease the wheels” of some local and national government officials to get what they need, it still ends up being far cheaper to manufacture their goods in China.

India (the “Elephant”) is portrayed as just that. It is slow and plodding in its economic growth, but it is building up a head of steam. India’s path to economic reform started much more recently. In 1991, the government finally realized that if it did not fundamentally change its economic model that its citizens would starve. The country was simply too large to be self-sustaining. India had largely cut itself off from the rest of the world. It had created high tariffs on imports so that foreign goods were impossibly expensive for the average Indian, completely eliminating the market for foreign goods. The problem was that while this gave Indian companies the advantage in serving the large population of its own country, the lack of competition made the companies inefficient and complacent. They were dinosaurs which were not prepared for the economic tidal wave that started in 1991. For a long time, one of the biggest arguments for not revising the economic model was that allowing foreign companies in to the country would put many local companies out of business. Indeed it did have that effect. However, the net effect for Indians has been positive, not negative. Even though some lost their jobs in those companies, there is now a large middle class made up of call center workers, computer programmers, and other white collar workers which can do jobs for less than a third of what they might cost in America. Companies are offshoring jobs by the hundreds, often using the American workers to train their Indian successors. Many in India argue that America’s economy is incredibly versatile, and that while this shift may cause many American’s to have to shift jobs, or perhaps even find new careers, that Americans have always had a natural agility for doing that sort of thing. While there has been tremendous prosperity in India, the differences between the modern western offices of Bangalore and the slums of Dharavi are striking. Due to the large population, and the lack of labor based progress in India (mostly due to the lack of infrastructure) the main job growth is only possible for the educated in India. Many Indians, especially those living in slums, are miniature entrepreneurs, selling goods to each other. The fact that there are people who are too poor to live in a slum, is the most troubling aspect in my view. Due to the democratically elected government, the challenge is to translate this economic prosperity to the masses, otherwise the government will keep changing until someone does. If that task falls to the wrong person, it could unravel much of the progress that has been achieved this far.

The Relevance:

This book is very relevant not only to our forthcoming journey to India, but also to our lives as we evaluate the job market going forward. I find myself with an engineering degree, and while I had opportunities to work, many of the jobs that I am qualified for are quickly moving to India where qualified people will work for much less than I would accept. I find it necessary, especially in my situation, to diversify my experience to try to set me apart. Indeed the global push that India in particular is putting on America is one of the reasons that I decided to pursue my MBA. America’s struggling economy (suddenly not the rock solid example of prosperity and the right way of doing things) has caused many people to reevaluate the way they look at things. As companies continue to look for ways to save money, more and more jobs will find their way abroad.

Where Meredith Falls Short:

Meredith falls short of her most important goal. While I believe that there are many benefits for American’s to the rise of both of these large companies, she doesn’t illustrate in enough detail exactly how it effects Americans, and more importantly, why we shouldn’t be extremely worried about this economic shift. Perhaps we aren’t as worried as we should be. It seems that this entire book should be a glowing bible of evidence as to why we should be incredibly worried. To her credit, by the end, Meredith does point out areas which America needs to continue to excel in, such as education, research, and cutting edge technology.

Where Meredith Excels:

Meredith excels in her attention to detail, and research, both personally and factually. Her anecdotes about conditions in factories, slums, and rural zones make it obvious that she has actually been to many of these places. She also does a good job of laying a clear groundwork for what both the elephant and the dragon need to do going forward to be successful. I thought she gave a great summary of the position of the militaries of both countries, as well as their positions relative to America. It was interesting to see the direct ties between the way that we are doing business, especially with China, and how that is helping them have the manufacturing technology and monetary resources to start competing with us in this area. It means that America will have to continue to spend large amounts of money on its own military in order to continue to stay ahead of China.

My Recommendations and Closing Thoughts:

I would recommend this book to anyone who has had their job offshored. I think it is an important read for any businessperson especially in the service sector, or in a manufacturing business. It will help them understand the sometimes strange inner workings of these two countries, for both political and cultural reasons. It is a good read for any American who wants to know exactly where most of our consumer goods come from, and where the service comes from when those consumer goods aren’t functioning properly. Overall, an important read, especially for the forthcoming trip, and for our futures as business leaders.